Why Misgovernment Was No Accident in George W. Bush’s Washington

I have pointed out to my friends at Lucianne.com many times over the years that the failures of this current administration are in fact ideologically driven; deliberate based on an anti-government ideology that defaults to corporate plutocracy at every turn.

How it is that people, even people who want smaller government, vote for a political party that doesn't believe government even has a function, in fact will deliberately fail because they don't believe the government should even be providing any service like hurricane relief, social security or regulations on dangerous business practices.
If you vote for Republicans, you get the government you deserve...... corrupt and deliberately ineffective....... deliberately incompetent.

Here is a very good article on this theme:

Published on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 by TomDispatch.com
Follow This DimeWhy Misgovernment Was No Accident in George W. Bush’s Washington
by Thomas Frank

Washington is the city where the scandals happen. Every American knows this, but we also believe, if only vaguely, that the really monumental scandals are a thing of the past, that the golden age of misgovernment-for-profit ended with the cavalry charge and the robber barons, at about the same time presidents stopped wearing beards.

I moved to Washington in 2003, just in time for the comeback, for the hundred-year flood. At first it was only a trickle in the basement, a little stream released accidentally by the president’s friends at Enron. Before long, though, the levees were failing all over town, and the city was inundated with a muddy torrent of graft.

How are we to dissect a deluge like this one? We might begin by categorizing the earmarks handed out by Congress, sorting the foolish earmarks from the costly earmarks from the earmarks made strictly on a cash basis. We could try a similar approach to government contracting: the no-bid contracts, the no-oversight contracts, the no-experience contracts, the contracts handed out to friends of the vice president. We might consider the shoplifting career of one of the president’s former domestic policy advisers or the habitual plagiarism of the president’s liaison to the Christian right. And we would certainly have to find some way to parse the extraordinary incompetence of the executive branch, incompetence so fulsome and steady and reliable that at some point Americans stopped being surprised and began simply to count on it, to think of incompetence as the way government works.

But the onrushing flow swamps all taxonomies. Mass firing of federal prosecutors; bribing of newspaper columnists; pallets of shrink-wrapped cash “misplaced” in Iraq; inexperienced kids running the Baghdad stock exchange; the discovery that many of Alaska’s leading politicians are apparently on the take — our heads swim. We climb to the rooftop, but we cannot find the heights of irony from which we might laugh off the blend of thug and Pharisee that was Tom DeLay — or dispel the nauseating suspicion, quickly becoming a certainty, that the government of our nation deliberately fibbed us into a pointless, catastrophic war.

Bad Apples All Around

So let us begin on the solid ground of these simple facts: this spectacular episode of misrule has coincided with both the political triumph of conservatism and with the rise of the Washington area to the richest rank of American metropolises. In the period I am describing, gentlemen of the right rolled through the capital like lords of creation. Every spigot was open, and every indulgence slopped out for their gleeful wallowing. All the clichés roared at full, unembarrassed volume: the wines gurgled, the T-bones roasted, the golf courses beckoned, the Learjets zoomed, the contractors’ glass buildings sprouted from the earth, and the lobbyists’ mansions grew like brick-colonial mushrooms on the hills of northern Virginia.

Democrats, for their part, have tried to explain the flood of misgovernment as part of a “culture of corruption,” a phrase at once obviously true and yet so amorphous as to be quite worthless. Republicans have an even simpler answer: government failed, they tell us, because it is the nature of government enterprises to fail. As for the great corruption cases of recent years, they cluck, each is merely a one-of-a-kind moral lapse unconnected to any particular ideology — an individual bad apple with no effect on the larger barrel.

Which leaves us to marvel helplessly at what appears to be a spectacular run of lousy luck. My, what a lot of bad apples they are growing these days!

Corruption is uniquely reprehensible in a democracy because it violates the system’s first principle, which we all learned back in the sunshiny days of elementary school: that the government exists to serve the public, not particular companies or individuals or even elected officials. We Are the Government, insisted the title of a civics primer published in the earnest year of 1945. “The White House belongs to you,” its dust jacket told us. “So do all the other splendid buildings in Washington, D.C. For you are a citizen of the United States.” For you, young citizen, does the Post Office carry letters to every hamlet in the nation. For you does the Department of Agriculture research better plowing methods and the Bureau of Labor Statistics add up long columns of numbers.

The government and its vast workforce serve the people: The idea is so deep in the American grain that we can’t bring ourselves to question it, even in this disillusioned age. Republicans and Democrats may fight over how big government should be and exactly what it should do, but almost everyone shares those baseline good intentions, we believe, that devotion to the public interest.

We continue to believe this in even the most improbable circumstances. Take the worst apple of them all, lobbyist Jack Abramoff, whose astonishing career as a corruptionist has been unreeling in newspaper and congressional investigations since I came to Washington. Abramoff started out as a great political success story, a protégé and then a confidant of the leaders of the conservative faction of the Republican Party. But his career disintegrated on news of the inventive ways he ripped off his clients and the luxury meals and lavish trips with which he bribed legislators.

Journalistic coverage of the Abramoff affair has stuck closely to the “bad apple” thesis, always taking pains to separate the conservative movement from its onetime superstar. What Abramoff represented was “greed gone wild,” asserts the most authoritative account on the subject. He “went native,” say others. Above all, he was “sui generis,” a one-of-a-kind con man, “engaged in bizarre antics that your average Zegna-clad Washington lobbyist would never have dreamed of.”
In which case, we can all relax: Jack Abramoff’s in jail. The system worked; the bad apple has been plucked; the wild greed and the undreamed-of antics have ceased.

Misgovernment by Ideology

But the truth is almost exactly the opposite, whether we are discussing Abramoff or the wider tsunami of corruption. The truth is as obvious as a slab of sirloin and yet so obscured by decades of pettifoggery that we find it almost impossible to apprehend clearly. The truth slaps your face in every hotel lobby in town, but we still don’t get the message.

It is just this: Fantastic misgovernment of the kind we have seen is not an accident, nor is it the work of a few bad individuals. It is the consequence of triumph by a particular philosophy of government, by a movement that understands the liberal state as a perversion and considers the market the ideal nexus of human society. This movement is friendly to industry not just by force of campaign contributions but by conviction; it believes in entrepreneurship not merely in commerce but in politics; and the inevitable results of its ascendance are, first, the capture of the state by business and, second, all that follows: incompetence, graft, and all the other wretched flotsam that we’ve come to expect from Washington.

The correct diagnosis is the “bad apple” thesis turned upside down. There are plenty of good conservative individuals, honorable folks who would never participate in the sort of corruption we have watched unfold over the last few years. Hang around with grassroots conservative voters in Kansas, and in the main you will find them to be honest, hardworking people. Even our story’s worst villains can be personally virtuous. Jack Abramoff, for example, is known to his friends as a pious, polite, and generous fellow.

But put conservatism in charge of the state, and it behaves very differently. Now the “values” that rightist politicians eulogize on the stump disappear, and in their place we can discern an entirely different set of priorities — priorities that reveal more about the unchanging historical essence of American conservatism than do its fleeting campaigns against gay marriage or secular humanism. The conservatism that speaks to us through its actions in Washington is institutionally opposed to those baseline good intentions we learned about in elementary school.
Its leaders laugh off the idea of the public interest as airy-fairy nonsense; they caution against bringing top-notch talent into government service; they declare war on public workers. They have made a cult of outsourcing and privatizing, they have wrecked established federal operations because they disagree with them, and they have deliberately piled up an Everest of debt in order to force the government into crisis. The ruination they have wrought has been thorough; it has been a professional job. Repairing it will require years of political action.
Conservatism-in-power is a very different beast from the conservatism we meet on the streets of Wichita or the conservatism we overhear talking to itself on the pages of Free Republic. For one thing, what conservatism has done in its decades at the seat of power is fundamentally unpopular, and a large percentage of its leaders have been men of eccentric ideas. While they believe things that would get them laughed out of the American Sociological Association, that only makes them more typical of the movement. And for all their peculiarity, these people — Grover Norquist, Tom DeLay, Jack Abramoff, Newt Gingrich, and the whole troupe of activists, lobbyists, and corpora-trons who got their start back in the Reagan years — have for the last three decades been among the most powerful individuals in America. This wave of misgovernment has been brought to you by ideology, not incompetence.

Yes, today’s conservatives have disgraced themselves, but they have not strayed from the teaching of their forefathers or the great ideas of their movement. When conservatives appoint the opponents of government agencies to head those government agencies; when they auction their official services to the purveyor of the most lavish “golf weekend”; when they mulct millions from groups with business before Congress; when they dynamite the Treasury and sabotage the regulatory process and force government shutdowns — in short, when they treat government with contempt — they are running true to form. They have not done these awful things because they are bad conservatives; they have done them because they are good conservatives, because these unsavory deeds follow naturally from the core doctrines of the conservative tradition.

And, yes, there has been greed involved in the effort — a great deal of greed. Every tax cut, every cleverly engineered regulatory snafu saves industry millions and perhaps even billions of dollars, and so naturally securing those tax cuts and engineering those snafus has become a booming business here in Washington. Conservative rule has made the capital region rich, a showplace of the new plutocratic order. But this greed cannot be dismissed as some personal failing of lobbyist or congressman, some badness-of-apple that can be easily contained. Conservatism, as we know it, is a movement that is about greed, about the “virtue of selfishness” when it acts in the marketplace. In rightwing Washington, you can be a man of principle and a boodler at the same time.

The Wrecking Crew in Full Swing

One of the instructive stories We Are the Government brought before generations of schoolkids was the tale of a smiling dime whose wanderings were meant to introduce us to the government and all that it does for us: the miner who digs the ore for the dime has his “health and safety” supervised by one branch of the government; the bank in which the dime is stored enjoys the protection of a different branch, which “sees that [banks] are safe places for people to keep their money”; the dime gets paid in tax on a gasoline sale; it then lands in the pocket of a Coast Guard lieutenant, who takes it overseas and spends it on a parrot, which is “quarantined for ninety days” when the lieutenant brings it home. All of which is related with the blithest innocence, as though taxes on gasoline and quarantines on parrots were so obviously beneficial that they required little further explanation.

Clearly, a more up-to-date version is required. So let us follow the dime as it wends its way through our present-day capital. Its story, we will find, is the reverse of what it was in 1945. That old dime was all about service, about the things government could do for us. But the new dime is about profit — about the superiority of private enterprise, about the huge sums that can be squeezed out of federal operations. Instead of symbolizing good government, the dime now shows us the wrecking crew in full swing.

Our modern dime first comes to Washington as part of some good citizen’s taxes, and it leaves the U.S. Treasury in a payment to a company that has been hired to do work on the nation’s ports. Back in 1945, the government would have done the work itself, but now it uses contractors for such things. This particular contractor knows how to win a bid, but it doesn’t know how to do the work, so it subcontracts the job to another outfit. The dime follows, and it eventually makes up a worker’s salary, who incorporates it into his monthly car payment. From there it travels into the coffers of an auto industry trade association, which happens to be very upset about a rule proposed by a federal agency that would require cars to notify drivers when their tire pressure is low.

So the trade association gives the dime to a Washington consultant who specializes in fighting federal agencies, and this man launches challenge after challenge to the studies that the agency is using in the tire-pressure matter. It takes many years for the agency to make its way through the flak thrown up by this clever fellow. Meanwhile, with his well-earned dime, he buys himself a big house with nice white columns in front.

But this is only the beginning of the story. As we make our rounds of conservative Washington, we glimpse something much greater than single acts of incompetence or obstruction. We see a vast machinery built for our protection reengineered into a device for our exploitation. We behold the majestic workings of the free market itself, boring ever deeper into the tissues of the state. Ultimately, we gaze upon one of the true marvels of history: democracy buried beneath an avalanche of money.

Thomas Frank, the author of What’s the Matter with Kansas?, is the founding editor of The Baffler, a contributing editor at Harper’s, and, most recently, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal. His WSJ columns can be read at his website. He lives, of course, in Washington D.C. and this essay has been adapted from his new book, The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule (Metropolitan Books, 2008).

From the book The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule by Thomas Frank, Copyright © 2008 by Thomas Frank. Reprinted by arrangement with Metropolitan Books, an Imprint of Henry Holt and Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Mary Ellen said...

From what I can see with the corruption in the DNC, they are following in the footsteps of the GOP. Not much will change in the next few years other than our country will be in worse shape than it is now...and there will be another party to blame for it. Same corruption, same incompetence, different party.

Ghost Dansing said...

i hope not mary ellen..... i think two things about that. the Republicans have gone beyond being right-wing and are rightists (as in fascists), they really don't believe government has a function other than moving public tax monies into corporate profit margins, and have embraced as a constituency christian theocrats who don't believe in secular government.

i'm afraid corporatism and "free marketeers" have a major influence in the DLC of the DNC, however, the tent is much larger and there are many interests that are not reducable to corporate profit margins.

thanks for dropping by..... of course i think you should vote the Democratic ticket anyway.

Daisy said...

Hey there, Ghost Dansing. :) You probably already know I'll be voting for the Democratic ticket. I'm so ready for things to be better than they are now, and I think the Democratic party will be much more likely to accomplish that than the Republican Party.

In any case, I am mostly just dropping by to tell you I hope you have a nice weekend. :D

Ghost Dansing said...

thanks for dropping by daisy..... you too and i'm glad....

Utah Savage said...

I'm worried by democrats like Mary Ellen who didn't get her gal and now wants to vote against her best interests. I worry that racism is so endemic in our culture that Barack won't be able to transcend that long simmering hatred. I'm worried that we Americans like our thought black and white--not nuanced, not complicated, not intelligent. We seem poised to vote for the old guy, the "hero" the man with "experience." I watched the Rev Whatsisname last night. The audience seems uncomfortable with the smart response and cheers for the dumb guy. Who are we that we've become so damn stupid and lazy, so angry when we don't get our way--ie, Hillary? I've missed you ghost. Sorry I haven't been getting out much.

Ghost Dansing said...

i too am concerned that people are not perceiving the Republican Party for what it is..... a rightist phenomenon in American politics......

Beach Bum said...

Yeah I know decent conservatives that I would let babysit my kids. But like the a sci-fi movie once said a person can be generous, forgiving, and compassionate. People on the other hand can be and generally are cruel, bigoted, and unfeeling.

SaoirseDaily2 said...

I have always been terrified by the republicans and have always voted as a loyal Democrat. Probably always will. Thanks for all the great videos you send me.
I am absolutely thrilled O picked Biden as his running mate!!

Ghost Dansing said...

me too..... thanks for dropping by Saoirse. your certainly welcome.... glad you like them.....

Mariamariacuchita said...

I have never once voted for a republican, nor have found one I would be willing to vote for.

Ghost Dansing said...

thanks for dropping by Maria.... i'm not seeing much attractive about the Republican Party and am amazed anybody but the very very rich corporate plutocrats, and a coalition sect of authoritarian theocrats would be interested in voting for them.

Mary Ellen said...

I came over here to tell you that I noticed last night that some of your comments had ended up in the spam hell of WordPress for some reason. I released them last night and apologize that it happened. I marked it so it won't happen again and hopefully your comments will show up. E-mail me at me@divinedem.com if you have any further trouble, ghostdansing.

Now...I didn't notice until this moment that Utah Savage found it necessary to insult me with her dimwitted view of who she thinks I am. Obviously, it's easy to go to another blog and make such a statement because she is too cowardly to come to my blog. That says a lot about her lack of character.

I will answer here (and I'm sorry ghostdansing for using your blog to do this), but my decision NOT to vote for Obama came long before I even supported Hillary. Of course, I've said that a thousand times on other blogs, but for some reason, those who support Obama cannot understand that SOME people actually took the time to look at his record (which I was well aware of since he is my State Senator) and record all his lies on the campaign trail. Now, I know this doesn't sit well with you, because you are too bitter to understand that SOME people put country before party. Isn't that what Democrats have been clamoring about to all those right wingers who continued to vote for Bush no matter what? Didn't you say that they don't care about our country, that they only care if a Republican wins? Guess what, Utah, it sounds like you are just like the right wingers.

The fact is..I never said I supported McCain. Deal with it. I may or may not vote for him. Deal with it. Obama may win this and if he does, you deal with him, but at least I know that I won't be responsible for the lousy job he will do. I suggest before you come out swinging at me, you do your homework, little girl.

Ghost Dansing said...

i never had a big confrontation on my blog Mary Ellen..... maybe this will spark one :)

nice to see you as usual. i like Obama and Biden. however, my politics are pretty transparent. i'm a yellow dog Democrat, and i have real concerns about what the Republican Party has actually become.

to get a feel, i liked IKE! the Republicans would essentially have to disintegrate and re-create themselves to be the Party of Eisenhower again.

always good to see you....

Mary Ellen said...

ghost dansing- LOL! Well, the last thing I would want to do is spark a big confrontation on your blog! But once you get to know me, I don't let ANYONE insult me and get away with it, I'll take them down in one full swoop. :-)

Well, I'm certainly not a Republican, but when I think they're actually right about something, I'll say it. I'll also defend any child who is being attacked by a bunch of cowardly bullies on the Internet. That's why I've been so quick to defend Sarah Palin's kids on other blogs. Some may not like that I won't support Obama, but that's too bad....they can shove it. I did say that Obama was correct in saying all kids of candidates were off limits. That's as good as he'll get from me.

Right now I think that the Dem party will have to disintegrate and re-create themselves before I can consider them the Party of Kennedy again. ;-)

btw- I split my blog and for now on all political posts will be on my old blog, The Divine Democrat and the other posts will be on Bad Habit. I'll add a hot link to the title of a new post on The Divine Democrat in each post, so you can just click from there if you're interested....I just want you to know that I've not given up on politics...no way, no how. ;-)

Liquid said...

Oh, how I miss my 15 minutes of fame..............

gunpowder and lead!


Ghost Dansing said...

moments of intensity are wonderful..... however, life is far richer on slow burn.....

thanks for dropping by Liquid..... i really enjoy your blog, and always hope that my comments make it through moderation :)

Liquid said...

you have a "back stage" pass and I only have one to distribute. So, don't tell anyone. lol

Liquid said...

Oh, and to comment on your latest post..........we are all fucked reguardless. So, someone crank up the blender.......please.

Ghost Dansing said...

then there's that aspect :)

Jo said...

I love the music on your blog.

I agree with Mary Ellen, I think no matter who gets elected in your country, you guys are still in big trouble. I actually think McCain is the more honest of the two, but unfortunately he is a Republican. We are having an election in Canada in October, and usually whatever happens here is reflected in the US. So, if you folks have a Republican President, we have a Conservative Prime Minister. If Stephen Harper gets elected here, that means McCain will be elected in the US.

I don't trust Obama.

Ghost Dansing said...

thanks for dropping by Jo..... i like Obama, though he's said a couple things i find puzzling as a Liberal..... i've discussed them on Mary Ellen's site.

i am a yellow dog Democrat, which means i believe most yellow dogs are better suited to public office than any Republican.

also, the Republican Party in the United States has become an exclusively rightist phenomenon in American politics...... if Republicans continue to have their way, America won't even be America anymore.

McCain is a different candidate than when he ran against Dubya the first time. i would have preferred him to Dubya as President.

however, the Republican Party has moved its platform even closer to fascism than before, and McCain is so compromised that he is totally beholding to the "religious right" and corporate interests of the Bush administration.

he's spoiled goods..... doesn't even matter anymore who he is as a person, he is a total Party Boy now.....

G-Man said...

Palin disturbs me...

Thanks for dropping by my blog today, and thanks for sending me that Vid of the Angels.

You must have come from Liquids.

Ghost Dansing said...

me too g-man..... thanks for dropping by.

yes i found your site on Liquids blog.